Latest Law Related Forum Topics:

  • How do I become an airplane mechanic? (7 posts)
  • flying lessons? (8 posts)
  • Can anyone indentify this Biz Jet? (7 posts)
  • if you've ridden: what do you think of amtrak's services? (3 posts)
  • im scared of planes :[? (6 posts)
  • how much do people make working at the airport? (5 posts)
  • Pilot Lesson materials? (5 posts)
  • What happens after waste is seperated, treated on aeroplanes during flight? Is it released outside in-flight? (7 posts)
  • CA I carry a replica bb gun of an M16 and 9mm on a flight from Miami/Ft lauderdale to Haiti? (9 posts)
  • how do i switch to the tower view at the airport i'm landing at??.? (2 posts)
  • Experience or college? (6 posts)
  • Who invented the WigWag? (5 posts)
  • Talking to my Guidence counselor about Airline Job.......? (3 posts)
  • Do Air Transat planes have seat-back tvs in economy class? (3 posts)
  • can you believe the size of steam locomotives? (8 posts)
  •  
    Author Message

    TigerHen

    Members


    Online status

    88 posts

    Location: Samoa
    Occupation: Landlord
    Age:

    #40979   2008-05-13 21:35 GMT      
    Do you think amtrak will increase trains, where they don't travel now?

    CherryBerry

    Members


    Online status

    72 posts

    Location: Bolivia
    Occupation: Flight instructor
    Age:

    #40980   2008-05-13 22:50 GMT      
    they might add cars not trains since remember they
    are mostly a host on the freight railroad track
    they dont own the tracks (expect in the NEC)
    even if they wanted to add trains they can only during certain times of the year
    they just cant go out and add train "tomorrow" for example

    Iceblast

    Members


    Online status

    92 posts

    Location: Gambia
    Occupation: Fluffer
    Age:

    #40981   2008-05-13 23:18 GMT      
    They might. Freight traffic is certainly up. There's a lot of rail congestion. I suspect that'll get worse.

    I would expect them to move extremely slowly to add routes, unless they do it with fancy high-speed-rail projects. They can do stuff that costs a trillion dollars, and congress pays for it (congress gets trillions of dollars for free, so stupid things are easy.) It's harder for them to do things that are just ordinary proper management.

    SkateRForeveR

    Members


    Online status

    99 posts

    Location: Bermuda
    Occupation: Drayman
    Age:

    #40982   2008-05-13 23:24 GMT      
    Amtrak would love to increase its route structure, but can only do so with financial support, most of which comes from the US Congress. The current President isn't a fan of passenger trains, and proposes only minimal budgets for Amtrak--not enough to add any routes. Congress usually increases funding somewhat, but again not enough for new routes.

    Individual states can pay Amtrak to run more trains in their state, but only a handful of states have done so.

    If you're interested in learning more about this issue, visit the website of the National Association of Railroad Passengers, which aggresively supports an expansion of Amtrak's routes and service. Their website is:
    http://www.narprail.org

    Elgan

    Members


    Online status

    112 posts

    Location: Malta
    Occupation: Modeller
    Age:

    #40983   2008-05-14 01:45 GMT      
    Hopefully, but given the fact that the current administration is in bed with the oil companies, probably not.

    Gilbert

    Members


    Online status

    75 posts

    Location: Guadeloupe
    Occupation: Nurse
    Age:

    #40984   2008-05-14 23:15 GMT      
    Ridership is certainly increasing. Number of trains won't, much, because Amtrak doesn't have spare cars lying around.

    They have a great pile of derailment-damaged cars they don't have the money to fix (cars are made of stainless steel, so they're pretty much indestructible except for derailments). Some states like Illinois and California subsidize Amtrak service in their state, and sometimes one of the states will pay to fix up some of the cars, for service in their state.
    > 1 <